The controversy brought by gay marriages includes changing the norm of marriage and challenges in existing laws and religious traditions. Many religions in the world object to the issue of gay marriages on the grounds of morality. Churches base on their beliefs of what is wrong or right on scriptures which are holy writings.
The church believes that allowing the gay couples to adopt children would be an injustice as the children will lack the proper moral upbringing. Opponents of gay marriages cite the increased social costs such as healthcare thus affecting the economy.
Those against this kind of marriage think that same sex couples should not be allowed to adopt children. The opponents are generally concerned about the harmful effect gay marriages would have on the society in case of legalization.
They believe that the family institution is protected through heterosexual marriage whose main aim is to procreate.
They further believe that marriage would no longer have the same meaning if homosexual couples find alternative methods of having children Nagle First, every person has a right to exercise and acquire freedom and equality as a basic law. In many countries such as the United States same sex marriages are outlawed although some government leaders insist on legalizing the gay marriages because they believe in the principle of equality.
The church opposes same sex marriage since they believe that the bible instructs how Christians should properly live. The church believes that God wants marriage which is between a man and a woman. The church is against the legalization of gay marriages as they believe many people may choose to live homosexually thus promoting it as acceptable in the society. According to the church, allowing the gay couples to adopt children would be an injustice as the children will lack the proper moral upbringing.
If gay marriage was legalized they can have the same rights as heterosexuals in terms of adoption and medical rights Lopez In conclusion, issue of same sex marriage has raised many debates for many years. Same sex marriages have some disadvantages while on the other hand, it can mean denial of basic rights to enjoy the human benefits. Same sex marriages are outlawed in many countries such as the United States although some government leaders insist on legalizing the gay marriages because they believe in the principle of equality.
Many churches oppose same sex marriage and believe that God wants marriage to be between a man and a woman. Therefore, much of the opposition to same-sex marriage is rooted in the Bible and its ethical code. James Dobson, an anti-gay marriage advocate and evangelical Christian psychologist and author, frequently references the Bible as the foundation for his argument. This reflects his biggest concern about the legalization of same-sex marriage: The moral implications of same-sex marriage are ethically perverse and would only pave the way for additional sexual promiscuity Dobson.
What they fail to distinguish, however, is the fundamental difference between Canon and Common law. The United States has always differentiated between church and state ; therefore, the Constitution and the Bible are not, in this country, lawfully equivalent.
Because of our first amendment rights to freedom of religion, not everyone has to believe in God and thereby abide by His rules. An additional—and powerful—source of same-sex marriage support comes from the somewhat surprising field of business. As Supreme Court oral arguments commence, many businesses have begun to voice their advocacy. Because some states have legalized the unions of homosexual couples, the payroll systems and different tax treatments become a legal headache for employers.
Section three of the Defense of Marriage Act DOMA restricts gay couples from over one thousand federal benefits, including the right to file a joint tax return.
And according to noted NPR commentator and proponent of gay rights Jonathon Rauch, it would have human asset significance as well: It is a known sociological and anthropological fact that societies are fluid and dynamic. Cultural shifts are inevitable—social norms evolve and conform accordingly. Our founding fathers recognized this and planned appropriately by constructing the framework of our government to aptly deal with changes in societal norms and ideologies.
History tells us change is like eating your vegetables—met first by resistance and then swallowed with time. I believe that this is why the issue of same-sex marriage is not only significant in terms of tolerance and civil liberties, but also for future sociocultural questions that deal with the changing mentality regarding relationships and love.
Traditional values do not need to be compromised, only progressively reinforced and altered if necessary. For that reason alone, gay Americans should have the constitutional ability to marry. The supreme court ruled in June of that denying same-sex marriage is unconstitutional.
This ruling established gay marriage as legal in all fifty states. However, the ruling did not stop states from trying to disobey the court order by denying marriage licenses.
For example, a local county marriage clerk from Kansas, Kim Davis, was caught on video denying a marriage license to a same-sex couple. Random History explains that in the early civilizations of Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt, the union between couples of the same-sex was recognized by the kingdom.
Same-sex marriages were often believed to be more pure than a heterosexual marriage. Marriage was believed to be the union of two people based on love. A marriage consisting of two males or two females, if women had the right to get married, was not frowned upon. It was not until the rise of Christianity that a negative attitude towards same-sex marriage became introduced.
The belief that marriage was based on procreation and any relationship that was non-procreative began to increase in many societies. Japanese Buddhism records the most tolerant attitude toward homosexuality, praising it for its mystery. Today, there are no religious or political limitations on homosexual behavior in Japan. Sexuality is considered a private matter and lacks any restrictions.
Other things, such as mixed race relationships were considered more offensive than homosexuality. Random History also explains how in the thirteenth century, the first laws banning sodomy were introduced and were strictly enforced. Through the next centuries, homosexual behavior became deviant and was punished. Due to the belief that homosexual behavior was wrong, the belief that heterosexual relationships were normal became popular among the majority of countries.
By the nineteenth century, heterosexuality became the most believed standard for relationships. Although the debate for same-sex marriage became noticeably public in the late twentieth century, it was not until during a Hawaiian case, that the issue became national news. The ruling of the case stated that the restriction of marriage and its benefits to opposite-sex couples were unconstitutional. By that same year, a majority of states passed laws prohibiting same-sex marriage.
Since then, states have defined their own definition of marriage. Despite the fact that the debate over same-sex marriage is relatively new in the United States, five states have made same-sex marriage legal, as well as Washington D. In California, the marriage is only recognized if it was before proposition 8. Ballot Pedias research explains how proposition 8 is a statewide ballot proposition in California.
The people of California voted for the illegalization of same-sex marriage. Though some people are against same-sex marriages for religious reasons, not allowing same-sex marriages is discrimination.
Same-sex marriages should be legalized because the discrimination same-sex couples receive is emotionally traumatic, and unfair. The most influential reason against same-sex marriage is based on religion. Many people believe that procreation is the ideal reason for marriage.
Their belief is that same-sex couples do not have the capability to produce children which is the basis for marriage. However, when two of the most influential religious icons discussed marriage, child bearing was not a reason for two people to get married. Both men stressed how the quality of a relationship was the most important aspect for marriage.
If marriage is reserved for having a child, then same-sex marriages are not an issue. Many same-sex couples employ artificial insemination to conceive a child. The two have a 21 year old daughter by artificial insemination. People marry each other.
Sullivan also states how the church has blessed fields when crops have been planted, MX missiles, new houses, and warships whose sole purpose is to kill and destroy.
There is no reason the church should not bless a relationship in which two people vow to be faithful and love each other for all eternity. Supporters of same-sex marriage believe the bill to allow same-sex marriage should be crafted in a specific way that will help win votes from people of faith.
The National Organization of Women’s research details many of the 1, federal rights, protections and responsibilities that come along with marriage, which same-sex couples are denied.
Same-sex marriage refers to the right of two partners who are of the same sex to enter legally into the civil institution of marriage. To date, there are fifteen countries around the world that have passed the law of same-sex marriage, including Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Norway, Sweden, etc.
Argumentative essay on Same Sex marriage Marriage has been a part of life since before the medieval times. For two people who love each other and plan on spending the rest of their lives together, the natural instinct is to make it legal and get married. Points Research 3 Task B: The Annotated Bibliography 4 Putting the Pieces Together 11 The Overview 11 The Facts 11 The Final Conclusion 12 The Same-Sex Marriage Introduction and Background A marriage amongst two individuals of the same sex individuality and/or same genetic sex is known as gay marriage or same-sex marriage.
This argumentative essay on legalizing gay marriage describes why same-sex marriage should be allowed and why the Bible should not be looked upon for social justice.4/5(12). For my research paper, I challenged myself to write it about why same-sex marriage should not be legalized. After three days of research, I regret to inform you that, with the information I found, there is no logical reason whatsoever that same-sex couples should not be able to get married/5(2).